Climate Action Network Canada
About CAN Issues In the News Publications What You Can Do
Home
Donate
Site français





For release, December 18, 2009

Conservative MP Dismisses the Science of Climate Change

OTTAWA--Climate Action Network Canada has obtained recent email correspondence from Conservative Member of Parliament Colin Mayes (Okanagan Shuswap) dismissing the science of climate change stating just “a few scientists say CO2 is causing the planet to warm.”

The following is a statement by Climate Action Network Canada:

“Given the disgraceful and obstructive behavior of the Harper Government in Copenhagen, and the revelation of their secret plan to let emissions rise, it is a legitimate question to ask if Prime Minister Harper shares his MP’s views on the science of climate change. Prime Minister Harper and his Environment Minister no longer get to pay lip service to the science of climate change and do nothing about it,”  said Graham Saul of the Climate Action Network Canada. 

-30-

Please find below the original email exchange between MP Colin Mayes and his constituents.  The following Okanagan Shuswap constituents are willing to go on the record. Please contact Climate Action Network for more information.

Contact:
Hannah McKinnon

Climate Action Network Canada
+45 2553 6081

 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

 

------=_NextPart_000_04DE_01CA7FD0.E870EB80

Content-Type: text/plain;

            charset="us-ascii"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

 

-----Original Message-----

From: janet denison [mailto:j.denison@shaw.ca]

Sent: November 24, 2009 12:49 PM

To: 'MayesC@parl.gc.ca'

Subject: RE: Climate Change negotiations

 

Thank you for your considered response. I really appreciate the opportunity

to get your views on this matter, and I do understand your position. I also

appreciate all the work that has been done to reduce chemical contamination.

The only thing I don't understand is why you are saying just a few

scientists attribute global warming to human sources. I have always heard

that it is the consensus view.

I agree that, we may never be absolutely certain, perhaps not before it's

too late to do anything, how much of an impact we're having. But personally,

I just don't see how all the carbon we've been releasing (among other GHG's)

in just over 100 years couldn't be having a major influence on the climate!

I didn't realize just how potentially serious the situation was until I

understood how very thin the atmosphere, that stores the carbon, really is -

just the thickness of the distance from Vernon to Armstrong, or Vernon to

Lumby!

I think it's also important to note that although we may only be producing

3% of the worlds GHG's, we have less than 1% of the world population. For

that reason alone, I think we should be intent on reducing our emissions.

If, as the Prime Minister states, we want other countries to be responsible

for their emissions, shouldn't we be as well?

A recent poll stated that 75% of Canadians are not pleased with the

government's position on Climate Change. I just had to write back and let

you know, that despite where you're personally coming from, I still would

like you to let the Prime Minister know, I'd like more done.

I really think that businesses and voters are looking for leadership here.

I'd like to see a long term plan to encourage energy reductions throughout

the economy. Then, businesses and individuals would invest in energy

reduction knowing that they had the governments support and that it would be

cheaper in the long run.

I have 3 kids, I'm looking forward to having grandchildren, but I feel so

darned irresponsible, knowing that we are adding to the problem and not

taking action even though we can.

I hope you'll reconsider your views, I really don't think our government

will look foolish if they take action, the opposite is in fact occurring as

we speak.

Thank you so much for your time,

Janet

 

A+ students know these hidden patterns; now your student can too.

Watch our short video at soundpatternz.com

 

Janet Denison

5393 East Vernon Road,

Vernon, B.C.

V1B 3J7

Phone: 250-558-5393

Fax: 250-558-5392

Toll Free: 1-877-868-8867

 

-----Original Message-----

From: MayesC@parl.gc.ca [mailto:MayesC@parl.gc.ca]

Sent: November 24, 2009 11:08 AM

To: j.denison@shaw.ca

Subject: RE: Climate Change negotiations

 

 

Ms. Denison,

 

Thank-you for your email.

 

First, I would like to mention that when we became government there was no

plan or initiatives to meet Kyoto. We were already 35% over the targets that

Canada signed on to meet.

 

Second, Canada only emits 3% of the world green house gases so our Prime

Minister, the Right Honourable Stephen Harper, has worked through the G8 and

G20 to try to get all developed countries on a common page to lower GHGs.

 

Our focus as a new government was to address the quality of our air, water

and natural environment. We introduced a Bill to eliminate Mercury from our

environment. We brought in the Chemical Management Program that identifies

chemicals in the products we use and the food we consume.  We are the only

country in the world to actually ban the use of certain chemicals. We also

started work on a national water shed plan in a effort to protect Canada's

water sheds.

 

We have spent billions on renewable energy development and research. By 2012

96 % of our electric power generation will be emissions free. We have

invested in solar, wind, and biomass electric generation.

 

Our government set exhaust emission targets for the auto industry with

mandatory compliance in 2010. Furthermore we have invested hundreds of

millions in carbon capture development with the Alberta government in a

effort to reduce GHGs at the tar sands development. 40% of Canada's GHGs

come from the tar sands. 

 

Climate warming is happening.  Just what the cause is has yet to be

substantiated. Is it Co2 in the atmosphere, sun activity, or cyclical?  Is

this a trend that will change as we have seen recently in cooling of

temperatures and rebuilding of ice caps? 

 

A good book on this issue is "Climate Confusion" written by a Climatologist

in the US.  It's worth the read.

 

With oil prices up, this will force more development of alternative energy,

cut the waste of energy and make people more aware of their carbon foot

print. I also believe that as temporary citizens of this planet we should be

good stewards of all that has been given to us and make every effort to

protect the natural environment.

 

Saying this I am careful not to over react and spend billions of taxpayer

dollars because a few scientists say CO2 is causing the planet to warm.

Scientists, when I went to school, said that there was a coming ice age.

They also said that the ozone layer was disappearing over the Arctic.

(Remember the "Black Hole" that ended up being just the 24 hour sunlight

(Ultra violet light) breaking down the ozone layer in summer?  Then this was

reversed during the 24 darkness of winter.  This proved to be a natural

occurrence). This resulted in millions spent on observation  and scientific

research. Scientists theorise many things, some prove to be true some not. I

want to make certain when I vote my vote is supported by sound scientific

facts and less media hype.

 

I will continue to be vigilant on the issue of the environment and do all I

can to ensure cleaner air, water, and the elimination of toxins in our

natural environment.

 

Thanks for writing.

 

Colin Mayes, MP - Okanagan Shuswap 

 

  _____ 

 

From: janet denison [j.denison@shaw.ca]

Sent: November 17, 2009 2:29 AM

To: Mayes, Colin - M.P.

Subject: Climate Change negotiations

 

Dear Mr. Mayes,

I want you to know that I am looking for leadership from our Prime Minister

on the issue of climate change. I would prefer that our government consider

action on climate change as a top priority, and that this action not play

second fiddle to economic interests.

We need a made in Canada solution as far as our taking responsibility for

the GHG's we produce. I'd like to know that we were going into the

negotiations in Copenhagen with an offer and a plan to take responsibility

for the emissions we produce.

I don't see how we can keep the respect of other countries, and do what is

fair and right as far as our historic and current contributions are

concerned, if we don't have a plan for more ambitious targets, should the

opportunity to do more arise. 

Does your government have plans in place should the consensus from the

majority of governments be to aim for more ambitious targets than your

government has already set?

I look forward to your response.

Yours truly,

Janet

A+ students know these hidden patterns; now your student can too.

Watch our short video at soundpatternz.com

 

Janet Denison

5393 East Vernon Road,

Vernon, B.C.

V1B 3J7

Phone: 250-558-5393

Fax: 250-558-5392

Toll Free: 1-877-868-8867

 

------

 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

 

------=_NextPart_000_04DA_01CA7FD0.E86775A0

Content-Type: text/plain;

            charset="us-ascii"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

 

> From: MayesC@parl.gc.ca

> To: judy_stockdale@hotmail.com

> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:19:05 -0500

> Subject: RE: Copenhagen

>

> Ms. Stockdale,

 

>

> Thank-you for your email.

> First, I would like to mention that when we became government there was no

plan or initiatives to meet Kyoto. We were already 35% over the targets that

Canada signed on to meet.

> Second, Canada only emits 3% of the world green house gases so our Prime

Minister, the Right Honourable Stephen Harper, has worked through the G8 and

G20 to try to get all developed countries on a common page to lower GHGs.

> Our focus as a new government was to address the quality of our air, water

and natural environment. We introduced a Bill to eliminate Mercury from our

environment. We brought in the Chemical Management Program that identifies

chemicals in the products we use and the food we consume.  We are the only

country in the world to actually ban the use of certain chemicals.  We also

started work on a national water shed plan in a effort to protect Canada's

water sheds.

> We have spent billions on renewable energy development and research. By

2012 96 % of our electric power generation will be emissions free. We have

invested in solar, wind, and biomass electric generation.

> Our government set exhaust emission targets for the auto industry with

mandatory compliance in 2010. Furthermore we have invested hundreds of

millions in carbon capture development with the Alberta government in a

effort to reduce GHGs at the tar sands development. 40% of Canada's GHGs

come from the tar sands. 

> Climate warming is happening.  Just what the cause is has yet to be

substantiated. Is it Co2 in the atmosphere, sun activity, or cyclical?  Is

this a trend that will change as we have seen recently in cooling of

temperatures and rebuilding of ice caps? 

> A good book on this issue is "Climate Confusion" written by a

Climatologist in the US.  It's worth the read.

> With oil prices up, this will force more development of alternative

energy, cut the waste of energy and make people more aware of their carbon

foot print. I also believe that as temporary citizens of this planet we

should be good stewards of all that has been given to us and make every

effort to protect the natural environment.

> Saying this I am careful not to over react and spend billions of taxpayer

dollars because a few scientists say CO2 is causing the planet to warm.

Scientists, when I went to school, said that there was a coming ice age.

They also said that the ozone layer was disappearing over the Arctic.

(Remember the "Black Hole" that ended up being just the 24 hour sunlight

(Ultra violet light) breaking down the ozone layer in summer?  Then this was

reversed during the 24 darkness of winter.  This proved to be a natural

occurrence). This resulted in millions spent on observation  and scientific

research. Scientists theorise many things, some prove to be true some not. I

want to make certain when I vote my vote is supported by sound scientific

facts and less media hype.

> I will continue to be vigilant on the issue of the environment and do all

I can to ensure cleaner air, water, and the elimination of toxins in our

natural environment.

> Thanks for writing.

> Colin Mayes, MP - Okanagan Shuswap 

>

>

> ________________________________________

 

> From: Judy Stockdale [judy_stockdale@hotmail.com]

 

> Sent: December 17, 2009 12:31 AM

> To: Mayes, Colin - M.P.

> Subject: Copenhagen

>

 

> Canada's postion on  climate change has been obstructive and dismal. We as

a people should feel a sense of responsibility for our high emissions and

make every effort to reduce our CO2's. Our children face a future that we

can't even imagine. With 350  ppm as our goal, even this may not be enough.

Think of a world without fossil fuel dependency.  Our environment would be

clean, our oceans better able to support fish, our forest and lakes

unpolluted. The greatest sin our generation will commit will be the willful

contribution to species loss. Now we can add humans to that list. By this

time next century we will be reduced to a fraction of our present numbers,

and my grandchildren's children will only ask, Why didn't they do something

when they knew about global warming and had opportunities to make changes.

You Colin Mayes and your Conservative Party are Canada's only hope. You need

to act now before it is too late. Take the leadership role and commit Canada

to meaningful reductions.

Judy Stockdale

 

------ End of Forwarded Message